SmartHold's core strategy has three steps, applied the same way to every stock, every day, with no human discretion in the loop:
This same mechanism is also what any ticker YOU add to your own list gets checked against — SmartHold isn't only a picker of its own selections, it's a daily check on every holding in every list.
Every backtest and "Total Return" figure shown in the app is time-weighted (chained day-over-day from whatever was actually held that day) and includes an explicit transaction-cost assumption (0.3% round-trip) on every simulated entry, exit, and gold-hedge flip — it is not a frictionless, cost-free simulation.
The specific headline statistics quoted on our landing page and marketing pages — currently "95.3% win rate vs. plain buy-and-hold, across 1,030 Indian mutual funds backtested" and "+10.3pp average excess return from the gold-hedge switch" — describe one specific historical backtest, run against every mutual fund scheme searchable in SmartHold's own Mutual Funds tab (Direct, Growth-option, currently listed — this carries the usual survivorship bias of any "currently listed" universe: closed or merged schemes aren't in the test). 1,030 of 1,031 attempted schemes produced a usable result; each was tested from 1 January 2020 (or its own launch date, if later) through 22 September 2026, applying the same gold-hedge switch described in §1 against GOLDBEES, with transaction costs included on every switch. "Win rate" is the share of schemes where the strategy's CAGR beat that same scheme's own plain buy-and-hold CAGR over the identical window (982 of 1,030); "average excess return" is the mean of that gap (strategy CAGR minus buy-and-hold CAGR) across all 1,030 schemes. Not every scheme won — the worst case lost 18.87 percentage points to the switch, the best case gained 42.53 points. This window (2020–2026) included the COVID-19 crash and an unusually strong multi-year rally in gold, both of which favoured a gold-hedge rule; results over other periods may be materially weaker.
Every backtest has the same fundamental limitation: it shows what a strategy would have done on data that has already happened. It cannot account for every real-world friction (slippage beyond the assumed 0.3%, liquidity constraints on illiquid names, taxes, your own entry/exit timing relative to a signal), and a strategy that performed well over a historical period is not guaranteed to perform similarly in the future.
| Source | What it provides |
|---|---|
| Yahoo Finance | Live and historical stock/ETF prices, India and US |
| mfapi.in | Indian mutual fund NAV history (an independent, unofficial wrapper around AMFI's own published data) |
| screener.in | Stock fundamentals (the Value/Quality scores behind the fundamentals screen) |
| NSE | Daily Nifty 50/200/500 constituent list |
None of these are first-party sources we control — SmartHold depends on each of them continuing to publish accurate, timely data.
Neither SmartHold nor its operator, Praveen Baid, is registered with the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) as an Investment Adviser under the SEBI (Investment Advisers) Regulations, 2013, or as a Research Analyst under the SEBI (Research Analysts) Regulations, 2014. Nothing in SmartHold constitutes personalized investment advice. Please consult a SEBI-registered Investment Adviser or Research Analyst before making any investment decision.
Compliance or methodology questions: [email protected]. See also our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.